Revolution Sports Medicine builds on Revolution Surgical’s proven pedigree in orthopaedics, with precision, innovation, and performance at the forefront. Backed by years of expertise in joint reconstruction, trauma, and biologics, Revolution has created a sports medicine portfolio engineered to excel in the operating theatre.
MagnetOs™ is a bone graft like no other: thanks to its NeedleGrip™ surface technology, it grows bone even in soft tissues.* This surface technology provides traction for our body’s vitally important ‘pro-healing’ immune cells (M2 macrophages).†‡ [1,2]
This in turn, unlocks previously untapped potential to stimulate stem cells – and form new bone throughout the graft.†§[3-6]
1. Duan, et al. eCM. 2019;37:60-73.
2. Van Dijk, et al. eCM. 2021;41:756-73.
3. Van Dijk, et al. JOR Spine. 2018;e1039.
4. Van Dijk, et al. J Biomed Mater Res. Part B: Appl Biomater. 2019;107(6):2080-2090.
5. Van Dijk, et al. Clin Spine Surg. 2020;33(6):E276-E287.
6. Data on file.
5. Van Dijk, et al. Clin Spine Surg. 2020;33(6):E276-E287.
6. Data on file.
2. Van Dijk, et al. eCM. 2021;41:756-73.
6. Data on file.
2. Van Dijk, et al. eCM. 2021;41:756-73.
3. Van Dijk, et al. JOR Spine. 2018;e1039.
4. Van Dijk, et al. J Biomed Mater Res. Part B: Appl Biomater. 2019;107(6):2080-2090.
5. Van Dijk, et al. Clin Spine Surg. 2020;33(6):E276-E287.
6. Data on file.
12. Yu, et al. J Cell Biochem. 2016;117(7):1511-1521.
13. Ligouri, et al. Cell Mol Immunol. 2021;18(3):711-722.
6. Data on file.
13. Ligouri, et al. Cell Mol Immunol. 2021;18(3):711-722.
14. Zhang, et al. Cell Tissue Res. 2017.
15. Arosarena, et al. J Cell Physiol. 2011;226(11):2943-2952.
6. Data on file.
13. Ligouri, et al. Cell Mol Immunol. 2021;18(3):711-722.
The growing body of science behind NeedleGrip is called osteoimmunology. But for surgeons and their patients it means one thing: a more predictable fusion.†¶[5,6]
MagnetOs is proven to be equivalent to the gold standard of autograft for spinal fusions.[2,4,5,16] It has been used in more than 25,000 fusion surgeries to date and is supported by an unprecedented blend of scientific, pre-clinical and clinical studies through Project Fusion: our global research program, where science and clinical evidence meet.
Kuros is dedicated to reliably translate evidence from benchtop through to patient. To see how, review our extensive list of studies including peer-reviewed results from our latest Level I clinical trial published in Spine.[16]
2. Van Dijk, et al. eCM. 2021;41:756-73.
4. Van Dijk, et al. J Biomed Mater Res. Part B: Appl Biomater. 2019;107(6):2080-2090.
5. Van Dijk, et al. Clin Spine Surg. 2020;33(6):E276-E287.
16. Stempels, et al. Spine. 2024;49(19):1323-1331.
16. Stempels, et al. Spine. 2024;49(19):1323-1331.
1. Peel, T.N., Cheng, A.C., Liew, D., Buising, K.L., Lisik, J., Carroll, K.A., Choong, P.F.M. and Dowsey, M.M. (2015), Direct Hospital Cost Determinants Following Hip and Knee Arthroplasty. Arthritis Care & Research, 67: 782-790. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.22523
2. Towfigh, S., Cheadle, W. G., Lowry, S. F., Malangoni, M. A., & Wilson, S. E. (2008). Significant reduction in incidence of wound contamination by skin flora through use of microbial sealant. Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill.:1960), 143(9), 885–891.
3. Peel, T. N., Cheng, A. C., Lorenzo, Y. P., Kong, D. C., Buising, K. L., & Choong, P. F. (2013). Factors influencing the cost of prosthetic joint infection treatment. The Journal of hospital infection, 85(3), 213–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2013.07.012
5. Prince, D., Kohan, K., Solanki, Z., Mastej, J., Prince, D., Varughese, R., & Patel, M. (2017). Immobilization and death of bacteria by Flora Seal microbial sealant. Int J Pharm Sci Invent, 6(6), 45-49.
6. Data on File. HB Fuller - Medical Adhesives Technology
SurgiSeal® Topical Skin Adhesive is a high purity, antimicrobial, liquid topical skin adhesive that can replace sutures for incision or laceration repair.
SurgiSeal® is the only topical skin adhesive in the world to receive FDA 510K Clearance in demonstrating inhibition of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria growth.[1]
SurgiSeal® provides the optimal balance between strength and flexibility. In replacing sutures for incision or laceration repair, it can save time, provide a flexible, water-resistant, protective coating, and eliminate the need for suture removal.
1. SurgiSeal IFU: Due to the anhydrous property of the SurgiSeal adhesive, gram+ and gram- bacteria which become incorporated within the adhesive upon application, are not expected to grow.
Zip is a non-invasive skin closure device for surgical incisions and lacerations. It's designed to distribute strain along the incision. This helps reduce wound complications[1,2], saving you cost and time.[3,5]
Zip’s benefits aren’t only limited to healthcare providers. The puncture-free skin closure method also leads to greater patient satisfaction.[6] This means less pain, a greater range of motion during recovery, and reduced scarring.[7,8]
1. Carli A., Haas SB. Novel Non-Invasive Secure Skin Closure Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: Fewer Wound Complications & No Patient Home Care Visits Compares to Staples, Paper presented at ISTA; 1 Oct 2015; Vienna, Austria.
2. Davis, A., et. al., Effect of Surgical Incision Closure Device on Skin Perfusion Following Total Ankle Arthoplasty, UF Health Poster Presentation at ACFAS, March 2017
1. Carli A., Haas SB. Novel Non-Invasive Secure Skin Closure Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: Fewer Wound Complications & No Patient Home Care Visits Compares to Staples, Paper presented at ISTA; 1 Oct 2015; Vienna, Austria.
3. Alnachoukati O, Emerson R, Muraguri M (March 20,2019) Non-Invasive, Zip Type Skin Closure Device vs. Conventional Staples in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Which Method Holds Greater Potential for Bundled Payments?. Cures 11(3):e4281. DOI 10.7759/cureus.4281
3. Alnachoukati O, Emerson R, Muraguri M (March 20,2019) Non-Invasive, Zip Type Skin Closure Device vs. Conventional Staples in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Which Method Holds Greater Potential for Bundled Payments?. Cures 11(3):e4281. DOI 10.7759/cureus.4281
5. Goldman DS, Hammill E, Aasbo J, Storne E, Reddy S. Improvement in S-ICD Incision Closure Time and High Implanter Satisfaction Using a Novel Skin Closure Device. Scientific presentation given at Asia-Pacific Heart Rhythm Society 2017 Meeting; Sep 16, 2017; Yokohama, Japan.
4. Tanaka, Y. et al. Randomized Study of a New Noninvasive Skin Closure Device for Use After Congenital Heart Operations. Ann Thorac Surg 2016.
5. Goldman DS, Hammill E, Aasbo J, Storne E, Reddy S. Improvement in S-ICD Incision Closure Time and High Implanter Satisfaction Using a Novel Skin Closure Device. Scientific presentation given at Asia-Pacific Heart Rhythm Society 2017 Meeting; Sep 16, 2017; Yokohama, Japan.
6. Menkowitz B, Olivieri G, Belson O (January 19, 2020) Patient Satisfaction and Cosmetic Outcome in a Randomized, Prospective Study of Total Knee Arthroplasty Skin Closure Comparing Zip Surgical Skin Closure with Staples. Cureus 12(1): e6705. DOI 10.7759/cureus.6705
7. Alnachoukati O, Emerson R, Muraguri M (March 20,2019) Non-Invasive, Zip Type Skin Closure Device vs. Conventional Staples in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Which Method Holds Greater Potential for Bundled Payments?. Cures 11(3):e4281. DOI 10.7759/cureus.4281
8. Benner RW, Behrens JP. Poster Presentation: “A Novel Skin Closure Device for (Bilateral) Total Knee Arthroplasty: Randomized Controlled Trial vs. Staples.” Poster Presentation presented at American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons; Nov 3, 2017;
8. Benner RW, Behrens JP. Poster Presentation: “A Novel Skin Closure Device for (Bilateral) Total Knee Arthroplasty: Randomized Controlled Trial vs. Staples.” Poster Presentation presented at American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons; Nov 3, 2017;
9. Levi K, Ichiryu K, Kefel P, et al. (October 12, 2016) Mechanics of Wound Closure: Emerging Tape-Based Wound Closure Technology vs. Traditional Methods. Cureus 8(10); e827. DOI 10.7759/cureus.827
10. Ko, J. H., Yang, I. H., Ko, M. S., Kamolhuja, E. and Park, K. K. (2016), Do zip-type skin-closing devices show better wound status compared to conventional staple devices in total knee arthroplasty?. Int Wound J, 14: 250-254. doi:10.1111/iwj.12596
ADAPTABLE® is the first fully-sterile, surgeon-controlled limb and retractor holder. The fully-mechanical carbon fibre surgical arm works seamlessly with any standard operating table and has the ability to reduce the number of assistants in the operating room. ADAPTABLE is easy to set up, transport, and store.
Introducing the RAMP™ Knee Positioning System is a cutting-edge medical device designed to elevate the standard of care in surgical environments. Built for precision, speed, and safety, RAMP optimizes retraction and procedural access, enabling surgeons to work more efficiently with enhanced visibility and control.
Six Stable Positions
Effortlessly transition between approximately 55°, 90°, 115°, 140°, and 150° knee flexion angles, facilitating unrestricted soft tissue assessment and seamless dynamic registration for computer navigation.
Enhanced Surgical Ergonomics
The elevated foot design minimizes changes in the surgical field's height during procedures, promoting better ergonomics and reducing strain.
Optimized Pad Design
Features a firm, flat surface for stable foot positioning and a soft, rounded distal side to protect the Achilles tendon, ensuring patient comfort throughout the procedure.
Simple Setup
Quickly secures to any standard operating room table using two Velcro straps, streamlining setup and turnover times.
Hands-Free Stability
When used with a lateral support and a wedge beneath the hip, the RAMP provides maximum stability across all six leg positions, allowing unobstructed access to the surgical site.
Cast21 is a long-overdue upgrade to traditional fracture immobilization. Designed with both patients and providers in mind, Cast21 offers a faster, cleaner, and more comfortable alternative to plaster and fiberglass casts.
Rapid application
Quick to apply, with no lengthy wait times.
Mess-free
Eliminates plaster and fiberglass dust, water, and debris.
Breathable and waterproof
Improves hygiene, reduces odor, and allows normal showering/swimming.
Lightweight open-lattice design
Increases airflow and comfort while maintaining strength.
Improved patient experience
Less skin irritation and more freedom in daily activities.
Durable and supportive
Ensures reliable immobilization without the bulk of traditional casts.
Faster return to life
Helps patients get back to work, sport, and daily routines sooner.
The Accurian™ Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) platform combines proprietary hardware design and quad core processing, resulting in sophisticated algorithms that manage power and control temperature during ablation surgery. The Accurian™ Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) therapy platform has been extensively tested for lasting reliability and is upgrade-ready for the future.
Internally cooled probes create larger, spherical lesions (compared to standard lesions) with greater distal projection.
7. Marulanda GA,Ulrich SD, Seyler TM, Delanois RE, Mont MA. Reductions in blood loss with a bipolar sealer in total hip arthroplasty. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2008;5(2):125–131.
7. Marulanda GA,Ulrich SD, Seyler TM, Delanois RE, Mont MA. Reductions in blood loss with a bipolar sealer in total hip arthroplasty. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2008;5(2):125–131.
8. Suarez JC, Slotkin EM, Szubski CR, Barsoum WK, Patel PD. Prospective, Randomized Trial to Evaluate Efficacy of a Bipolar Sealer in Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2015;30(11):1953–8.
8. Suarez JC, Slotkin EM, Szubski CR, Barsoum WK, Patel PD. Prospective, Randomized Trial to Evaluate Efficacy of a Bipolar Sealer in Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2015;30(11):1953–8.
7. Marulanda GA,Ulrich SD, Seyler TM, Delanois RE, Mont MA. Reductions in blood loss with a bipolar sealer in total hip arthroplasty. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2008;5(2):125–131.
8. Suarez JC, Slotkin EM, Szubski CR, Barsoum WK, Patel PD. Prospective, Randomized Trial to Evaluate Efficacy of a Bipolar Sealer in Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2015;30(11):1953–8.
9. Ackerman SJ, Tapia CI, Baik R, Pivec R, Mont MA. Use of a Bipolar Sealer in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Medical Resource Use and Costs Using a Hospital Administrative Database. Orthopedics 2014;37(5):e472–481.
9. Ackerman SJ, Tapia CI, Baik R, Pivec R, Mont MA. Use of a Bipolar Sealer in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Medical Resource Use and Costs Using a Hospital Administrative Database. Orthopedics 2014;37(5):e472–481.
9. Ackerman SJ, Tapia CI, Baik R, Pivec R, Mont MA. Use of a Bipolar Sealer in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Medical Resource Use and Costs Using a Hospital Administrative Database. Orthopedics 2014;37(5):e472–481.
10. Nichols C, Vose J. Clinical Outcomes and Costs Within 90 days of Primary or Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty. Arthroplasty 2016;Epub ahead of print.
8. Suarez JC, Slotkin EM, Szubski CR, Barsoum WK, Patel PD. Prospective, Randomized Trial to Evaluate Efficacy of a Bipolar Sealer in Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2015;30(11):1953–8.
9. Ackerman SJ, Tapia CI, Baik R, Pivec R, Mont MA. Use of a Bipolar Sealer in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Medical Resource Use and Costs Using a Hospital Administrative Database. Orthopedics 2014;37(5):e472–481.
11. Rosenberg AG. Reducing blood loss in total joint surgery with a saline-coupled bipolar sealing technology. J Arthroplasty 2007;22(4 Suppl 1):82–85.
12. Clement RC, Derman PB, Graham DS, Speck RM, Flynn DN, Levin LS, Fleisher LA. Risk factors, causes, and the economic implications of unplanned readmissions following total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2013 Sep;28(8 Suppl):7-10.
13. Data on file. VR-00083 study summary. 71-10-2454.
14. Vose JG, McAdara-Berkowitz J. Reducing scalpel injuries in the operating room. AORN J. 2009;90(6):867-872.
13. Data on file. VR-00083 study summary. 71-10-2454.
15. Ruidiaz ME, Messmer D, Atmodjo DY, et al. Comparative healing of human cutaneous surgical incisions created by the PEAK PlasmaBlade, conventional electrosurgery, and a standard scalpel. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128(1):104-111.
MatriDerm® works as a regenerative adhesion barrier for both tendons and nerves.
MatriDerm® provides an optimal protective environment during tendon healing and avoids adhesion formation.
According to a recent review, application of a single-use negative pressure wound therapy system reduced the rate of SSI by 58% compared to standard of care. Additionally, patients had less hospital LOS compared to standard of care.[1]
The Genadyne NPWT portfolio is completely comprehensive, from Ultraportable Single-Use and Reusable Pumps to High Demand and Instil Pumps. The Dressing Portfolio is compatible across all NPWT Pumps, allowing for an all-inclusive ecosystem for a hospital institution. From Absorbent Dressings that can be used with or without NPWT, ready to use Foam Dressings, and all the way to large Foam Kits, Abdominal Kits and PVA Kits.
Closed incision management negative pressure has been proven to:
More than just a colour…
The visual impact of the Genadyne Green Foam is undeniable. Green was chosen to allow clinicians to better differentiate between viable and nonviable tissue in the wound bed. The colour contrast increases differentiation with the wound bed.
Competitor
Patented Genadyne Green Foam
Properties
Benefits
Fully reticulated polyurethane foam
Increased hydrolytic stability
Polyether resin
Increased tensile strength
Pore Size
Boosts performance under pressure
Dodecahedron cell structure / 3 dimensional skeletal strands
Enhanced filtering qualities
Increased tensile strength
Reduced risk of fraying
Non-adherent properties
Reduced discomfort during dressing change
The advanced variable pressure capabilities of all of the Genadyne Negative Pressure Pumps, allow different negative pressures to be used without the downsides of painful intermittent therapy.
By maintaining negative pressure throughout the cycle, variable negative pressure wound therapy avoids losing an airtight seal and displacement of the dressing. This gradual “wave” is gentler to the patient increasing blood flow to the peri-wound and preventing ischemia. The changes in pressure are imperceptible to the patient, increasing patient comfort and compliance.
The literature suggests that the use of Variable Pressure is beneficial. It results in decreased blood flow that is known to stimulate angiogenesis and granulation tissue formation and to increase blood flow that is known to facilitate oxygenation and nutrient supply and removal of waste products. [2]
Cycling the negative pressure level may be beneficial especially when treating poorly vascularized tissue with a risk for development of ischemia, as pressure is released repeatedly.[2]
1. Sugrue M, Ciprandi G, Djohan R, et al. . World Union of Wound Healing Societies (WUWHS) Consensus Document. Closed surgical incision management: Understanding the role of NPWT. Wounds Int [Internet]. 2016. www.woundsinternational.com/wuwhs/view/consensus-document-closed-surgica... (Last accessed July 29, 2017)
2. Ola Borgquist, MD; Richard Ingemansson, MD, PhD; and Malin Malmsjö, MD, PhD (2010) The Effect of Intermittent and Variable Negative Pressure Wound Therapy on Wound Edge Microvascular Blood Flow
Q-Close™ surgical sutures deliver the precision, reliability, and consistency surgeons expect—without the premium price tag.
Manufactured by Healthium Medtech, the world’s largest independent producer of surgical needles and one of the top global suture suppliers, Q-Close™ brings world-class quality to the Australian market.
Our range includes absorbable and non-absorbable options in a variety of sizes, materials, and needle configurations—engineered for optimal tissue handling, knot security, and minimal trauma. Backed by decades of surgical expertise and rigorous manufacturing standards, Q-Close™ gives you confidence in every closure.
AUSTRALIA
Revolution Surgical Pty Ltd
4/22 Rowood Road, Prospect NSW 2148
ABN: 63 165 643 434
NEW ZEALAND
Revolution Surgical New Zealand Ltd
378 Neilson Street, Penrose Auckland 1061 New Zealand
NZBN: 145-925-924
© 2018- Revolution Surgical
Website by: 
